Grandstanding

January 31st, 2010 § 10 comments

I read a cou­ple of blog posts and news­pa­per arti­cles over the Christ­mas and New Year period about the devel­op­ing use of ICT in Scot­tish schools. These pieces both­ered me at the time, not because I dis­agreed with the views expressed (although I did), but because I found myself dis­turbed by the mind­set that gen­er­ated them.

Basi­cally, they were writ­ten by peo­ple who have, for no dis­cern­able rea­son that I can glean, appointed them­selves as the guardians of all that is good in the use of tech­nol­ogy in teach­ing and learn­ing. What is ‘good’, of course, in this con­text, is what­ever they have decided is ‘good’. What is ‘bad’ is any­thing that they have deter­mined does not fit with their world-view, a world-view that seems to shift and shim­mer with the pass­ing of each tech-fad or techno-fancy.

Such peo­ple are, in my opin­ion, selfish.

Why? Because they are more con­cerned with dis­play­ing their own advanced think­ing, their own leading-edge prac­tice (self-defined, of course) — and they seem entirely uncon­cerned with the needs of their col­leagues who (in their own terms, again) trail behind them. Grand­stand­ing must do some­thing for their self-regard, I sup­pose, but it achieves pre­cisely noth­ing for all those teach­ers who still lack con­fi­dence in the use of ICT in their class­rooms, or who, gen­uinely, ques­tion the effi­cacy of bring­ing tech­nol­ogy into the class­room at all, or who need to see and hear exam­ples of good prac­tice that is not dog­matic about plat­forms or pro­pri­etory labels or the myr­iad ‘isms’ that inhabit this space.

I do not believe that such grand­stand­ing achieves any­thing for Scot­tish edu­ca­tion (or for edu­ca­tion gen­er­ally, since such behav­iour is by no means restricted to our own shores). I do believe that those who are gen­uinely work­ing to help doubt­ful, ten­ta­tive and unin­formed col­leagues across the coun­try become famil­iar with just a few exam­ples of good prac­tice in the use of ICT in the class­room are to be admired and sup­ported. Only they have our wider inter­ests at heart.

Tech­no­rati Tags: , , ,

§ 10 Responses to Grandstanding"

  • Alan Coady says:

    Well said, John. I can’t remem­ber a time when there were such con­trast­ing views on a sin­gle aspect of edu­ca­tion — with the pos­si­ble excep­tion of “the belt” which had just been banned when I started teaching.

  • Karen says:

    I also agree.
    Hec­tor­ing and rail­road­ing class teach­ers into adopt­ing new ICT prac­tices amounts to noth­ing short of bul­ly­ing. Some advo­cates are dis­mis­sive and sneer­ing of those who appear to resist new tech­nolo­gies.
    I say this as one who sees the value of ICT in the class­room as another tool in the teacher’s kit. Noth­ing more, noth­ing less.
    My view is that most teach­ers want what’s best for their pupils and that may or may not include games based learn­ing, social net­work­ing etc at this point in their indi­vid­ual context.

    New tech­nolo­gies are only as good as the teacher util­is­ing them and as their spe­cific LA allows them to be. Fur­ther, the very best teach­ers can deliver the best lessons with lit­tle more than a well phrased ques­tion and an open forum.

    Con­se­quently, I feel we need bal­anced, fact-based debate and not emo­tive, divi­sive rhetoric.

  • Kenny says:

    Hi John,
    I think I agree with most of what you say, but, as some­one who blogs about what we do in the class­room, includ­ing how tech­nol­ogy might aid lessons or learn­ing, I write that blog fully expect­ing that, by the nature of the media being used, some­one might chal­lenge it. Any­thing that goes on the blog is just shar­ing the expe­ri­ence of the class and myself, it’s not writ­ten with the cer­tainty that it’s the best way or the only way, and often by express­ing it on the web, some­thing comes back that makes me think again. Hope I haven’t yet again missed the point, but a thought pro­vok­ing post.

  • John Connell says:

    Don’t think you’ve missed the point at all, Kenny, oth­er­wise my crit­i­cisms would apply to my own blog too, of course :-)

    I think there’s a sub­stan­tial dif­fer­ence in atti­tude between those who want to, as you say, share expe­ri­ences or, occa­sion­ally, even chal­lenge oth­ers’ opin­ions on one topic or another, and those who merely use their plat­form, what­ever it is, to attract atten­tion to them­selves and to per­suade us all of their self-evident emi­nence in the field.

  • Social com­ments and ana­lyt­ics for this post…

    This post was men­tioned on Twit­ter by JCon­nell: Grand­stand­ing — those who do not have the wider inter­ests of edu­ca­tion at heart — http://bit.ly/b5xPFk

  • Bob Hill says:

    Hi John
    I agree whole­heart­edly with what you say. The tech­nolo­gies will come and go but the good teach­ing must remain.

    A pupil leav­ing my com­put­ing class some years ago men­tioned he was going to His­tory next and was really look­ing for­ward to it. I was sur­prised because I had always pri­vately thought of the teacher as a bit old fash­ioned and this lad was quite a tear­away. The rea­son he gave for his eager antic­i­pa­tion was that the teacher con­cerned dashed around the room re-enacting bat­tles leap­ing on chairs (before Elf and Safety) and bran­dish­ing a ruler as a sword. Much more excit­ing than a com­puter game!

  • Excel­lent post John. Artic­u­lated my thoughts on much of what has been hap­pen­ing lately. It’s so easy to be destruc­tive rather then constructive.

    …and Bob, what com­puter games are you play­ing? ;-)

  • John,

    I am fairly new to this envi­ron­ment but come with over 20 years of com­mer­cial IT expe­ri­ence and your points are just as valid in that con­text too.

    I have seen lots of busi­nesses fail because they adopted tech­nol­ogy for the sake of tech­nol­ogy or to.please a senior mgt zealot.

    I think the points in Clif­ford Stall’s book High Tech Heretic are still very relevant.

    Until we start sup­port­ing teach­ers with expe­ri­enced IT pro­fes­sion­als it will con­tinue to be a dif­fi­cult jug­gling act for teach­ing staff who under­stand the ben­e­fits id tech­nol­ogy but still want to stay focussed on theo edu­ca­tion process. Tech­nol­ogy must also be inclu­sive and not only rel­e­vant to. those who have access to tech­nol­ogy at home through tech­ni­cally lit­er­ate parents.

  • […] Grand­stand­ing : John Con­nell: The Blog http://www.johnconnell.co.uk/blog/?p=2357 – view page – cached I read a cou­ple of blog posts and news­pa­per arti­cles over the Christ­mas and New Year period about the devel­op­ing use of ICT in Scot­tish schools. These pieces both­ered me at the time, not because I dis­agreed with the views expressed (although I did), but because I found myself dis­turbed by the mind­set that gen­er­ated them. […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

What's this?

You are currently reading Grandstanding at John Connell: The Blog.

meta