I Am Learner

July 28th, 2011 § 19 comments

I am learner.

Just as no one can see the colours I see, just as no one can hear the music I hear, just as no one can feel what I feel when I hold some­thing in my hand, and just as no one can sense the world as I per­ceive it around me, no one can teach me.

No one can teach me.

I am learner.

I am not taught. I learn. I am human and a social ani­mal, so I learn with oth­ers. I do learn from oth­ers, but what I learn is rarely, if ever, what is taught to me, and rarely, if ever, what oth­ers learn at the same time from the same teach­ers. Often I learn entirely alone.

I am learner.

I per­ceive. I use my senses to know the world around me. I dis­cern pat­terns. I shape my under­stand­ing through metaphor and anal­ogy. I seek to cre­ate pur­pose in my life. Some­times I con­ceive pur­pose where there is none; often I accept oth­ers’ con­cep­tions of pur­pose in life, oth­ers’ con­cep­tions of pur­pose in the universe.

I am learner.

I build a uni­verse in my mind and I live there, a uni­verse that changes con­stantly as I learn. All peo­ple, includ­ing the peo­ple I love, live along­side me in this con­stantly shift­ing uni­verse. I see only glimpses of the lives they lead, because, just as they are play­ers in my world, I am a player in all the uni­verses cre­ated by every other per­son alive.

I am learner.

I con­nect. I con­nect with peo­ple and ideas in the phys­i­cal and vir­tual worlds and dis­cern no bound­ary between the two worlds. I learn in, across, through, with and from the net­works in which I live, work, play and inter­act. I con­tin­u­ally extend my own poten­tial through my con­nec­tions. I make con­nec­tions between what I have already learned and what the world chooses to present to me through my own inter­ac­tions with the world and through the inter­ven­tions and actions of others.

I con­nect there­fore I learn.

I am learner.

I am able to recite facts, echo the opin­ions of oth­ers, assume the atti­tudes of so-called author­i­ties when urged to do so, but I pre­fer to seek real knowl­edge of the chang­ing world in which we live, gen­uine under­stand­ing of the real­i­ties of the human con­di­tion, authen­tic insight into our intrin­sic depen­dence on one another. My need to know for myself is stronger than my need to recite from or imi­tate others.

I am learner.

I imag­ine. I reach beyond the real­ity of my senses and there I build my own dreams and visions; some­times I wel­come oth­ers’ wish­ful think­ing and cre­ate my own place in their fan­tasies, accept­ing the val­ues they place before me, fil­ter­ing and refin­ing them to fit my uni­verse. Often, by acci­dents of time and place and birth, I am con­di­tioned by those around me to accept their social, moral, reli­gious and polit­i­cal val­ues. In these cir­cum­stances, I still cre­ate my own truth but I strug­gle to do so freely, con­strained by the stric­tures imposed on me by others.

I am learner.

I lis­ten to sto­ries from oth­ers; I tell my own sto­ries, to myself, to oth­ers; I par­tic­i­pate in sto­ries, mine and oth­ers’. I deter­mine who I am through a prism of dra­mas, tales, myths, his­to­ries, lies, assumed truths, rit­u­als, games and a com­plex and intri­cate nar­ra­tive that I weave around the real­i­ties of my life. I live and learn from the drama of the now and I recall and learn from the nar­ra­tives woven out of past dramas.

I am learner.

I am not taught.

I learn.

_________________________________________________________

A plain text ver­sion of I Am Learner can be down­loaded here.

Tech­no­rati Tags: , , , ,

§ 19 Responses to I Am Learner"

  • Ian Harper says:

    A pro­found set of obser­va­tions, John. A timely man­i­festo that deserves a wide audience.

    Ian

  • John says:

    Lovely work John. Deserves a bet­ter com­ment than this one.

  • Charlette says:

    Nice work John — writ­ing an essay just now for Stir­ling Uni on the nature of Pro­fes­sional Growth in teach­ers — might just quote some of this. Been read­ing lots about adults ‘learn­ing’ and much of what you have writ­ten fits in — the idea that you can teach — but what peo­ple ‘learn’ will be depen­dent on so many dif­fer­ent things — their expe­ri­ences, val­ues, per­cep­tions, senses etc etc

  • Piers Young says:

    I love this sort of post. I agree with a lot of it, but while I can’t explain it, my instincts are to dis­agree “no one can teach me” angle. A first shot would be that I think, by con­trast, every­one has some­thing to teach me.

    Any­way, I will have an enjoy­able Sun­day pon­der­ing this. Thank you!

  • John Connell says:

    Thanks, Piers.

    I sup­pose it depends on our inter­pre­ta­tion of ‘no one can teach me’. For me it has to be taken in the light of the fol­low­ing cou­ple of sen­tences ‘I am not taught. I learn’

    Peo­ple, of course, have lots to teach us. My point is whether what they teach is ever actu­ally what we learn. That does not detract from the power and value of teach­ing, or of teach­ers, but i do think it should give teach­ers pause for thought when they think that there is a sim­plis­tic process of knowl­edge trans­fer hap­pen­ing when they teach.

  • John Hat­tie has writ­ten a book “Vis­i­ble Learn­ing”. In it he cites some com­pelling research (Nuthall 2005) about your think­ing John — teach­ing does not equal learning.

    Yes, Piers, peo­ple have lots to teach us how­ever with­out the ‘con­sent’ of the learner, lit­tle hap­pens. In the end learn­ing is a choice. The vari­ables that Charlette men­tions that shape ‘what’ peo­ple learn are crit­i­cal. How­ever what John is sug­gest­ing, and I agree, the issue does not begin with ‘what’ but ‘if’; if the learner chooses to learn. Charlette’s fac­tors are a part of the attempt to inter­est the learner in learning.

    Just because a learner is ‘actively engaged’ does not mean that he/she is learn­ing; hands on does not guar­an­tee minds-on.

    The his­tory of mod­ern edu­ca­tion in North Amer­ica (and Asia) has focused on the teacher and the teach­ing as teach­ers see it and not on the learner and learn­ing as the learner (and the human brain) sees it. There are efforts in edu­ca­tion to try and switch the order because learn­ing as the learner views it, MUST inform teach­ing. Dif­fer­en­ti­ated Instruc­tion and other ‘reforms’ such as ‘brain-based’ are try­ing how­ever these attempts are still miss­ing the mark. Recon­cep­tu­al­iz­ing what it means to be a teacher is most likely the biggest issue in teach­ing today.

    This is beau­ti­fully writ­ten John and incred­i­bly pow­er­ful. Thank you for your insights. I am going to use this in my work­shops and I will let you know what happens.

  • John Connell says:

    I have John Hattie’s book, Susan — rec­om­mended to me by my good friend, Greg Whitby, who cites it often in his own work lead­ing the schools in Par­ra­matta, Sydney.

    You make a very impor­tant point about the ‘con­sent’ of the learner. And I agree that the very def­i­n­i­tion of what it is to be a teacher has to change.

    Thank you for the kind com­ments — and i will be very keen to learn how ‘I Am Learner’ goes down in your workshops.

    John

  • I have been say­ing for the last 15 years,
    there is no teach­ing
    there is learning

    We have to cre­ate learn­ing environment

  • Greg Whitby says:

    John

    As always, insight­ful and thought pro­vok­ing. Agree, teach­ing not always syn­ony­mous to learning.

    I was struck by the phrase ‘I con­nect there­fore I learn’. Recently, had Marco Tor­res run some work­shops for our teach­ers and he also spoke about how learn­ing hap­pens through con­nec­tions — asso­cia­tive infor­ma­tion, and how we need mut­li­ple points of entry.

    Greg

  • Erica Taylor says:

    Won­der­ful piece of writ­ing! The learner in this piece is very arro­gant but at the same time intel­li­gent with his ways of learning.

    I sat and re-wrote this poem in my own words to under­stand it bet­ter and it helped. The learn­ing is not one just of learn­ing but also teach­ing. While at the same time stresses con­stantly that no one teaches him.

    Loved It!! =]

  • John Connell says:

    Thanks, Erica,

    I don’t think I can recall being called arro­gant in such a nice way before.

    And thank your for the inter­pre­ta­tion. Of course I am try­ing to say that teach­ing is still crit­i­cally impor­tant, but the best teach­ing starts from an under­stand­ing of how learn­ing hap­pens, and from the knowl­edge that what is taught is rarely what is learned.

    In a way, this is merely a restate­ment of Ron Burnett’s notion of the ‘rad­i­cal impos­si­bil­ity of teach­ing’, which I have com­mented on before.

    John

  • Zoe Parker says:

    This is some­thing I can con­nect with, I make room for it so that I can first hear and then as I hear it I feel it con­nect­ing with my own fam­ily of extant ideas. It res­onates with other ideas from like minded edu­ca­tors and authors. I will try to remem­ber John and remem­ber that I am learner too. Thank you John and thank you to those who com­mented. This makes another bit of a com­plex mosaic come into sharper focus.

  • Magarrin says:

    This was an insight­ful take on the way peo­ple learn. The author took learn­ing not as some­thing he must do but as some­thing that he does instinc­tively and in his own way. He has an under­stand­ing of how every­one learns in their own way. This was very cre­ative and I enjoyed it.

  • Tyler Holtzclaw says:

    I found this very insight­ful. I never looked at learn­ing like this until I read this blog. I have dif­fer­ent beliefs on learn­ing and being taught some­thing now. Learn­ing is more of an instinct and teach­ers are just help­ing that instinct progress. I really did enjoy this.

  • […] seems my prose-poem I Am Learner is reach­ing some surprising […]

  • Tesh says:

    I absolutely love this

  • […] JC: I have always been inter­ested in the phi­los­o­phy and the psy­chol­ogy of learn­ing, as well as the ‘pol­i­tics’ of learn­ing. I have never been able or will­ing to view edu­ca­tion as an objec­tive or neu­tral activ­ity: edu­ca­tion has always been an instru­ment of ide­ol­ogy, often con­sciously, some­times uncon­sciously. Given that view, I believe that the only ten­able posi­tion as an edu­ca­tor is one in which the great­est level of con­trol pos­si­ble over what is learned ought to be ceded to each and every indi­vid­ual. Over the years, learn­ing from peo­ple as diverse as Ivan Illich, Mar­shall McLuhan, Ray­mond Williams, Ted Nel­son, Howard Rhein­gold, Paulo Freire, RF MacKen­zie and many oth­ers, I have worked on the premise that the dig­i­tal and net­work­ing tech­nolo­gies are the most pow­er­ful means we have of giv­ing peo­ple max­i­mum con­trol over their own learn­ing and, con­versely, wrench­ing con­trol away from the state or from what­ever social, reli­gious or cul­tural entity has sought to ‘edu­cate’ peo­ple in their own image. How we go about achiev­ing that is what excites me most in edu­ca­tion. I attempt to define my own phi­los­o­phy of learn­ing in a short prose-poem called I Am Learner. […]

  • […] I Am Learner in mind, this begs many more ques­tions than it answers, but it would be churl­ish in the extreme […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

What's this?

You are currently reading I Am Learner at John Connell: The Blog.

meta