Teacher as Daemon and Jester

December 31st, 2007 § 7 comments


Hav­ing just fin­ished re-reading Pullman’s tril­ogy “His Dark Mate­ri­als” it was a nice coin­ci­dence to come across the out­line of an intrigu­ing paper writ­ten by Hamish McLeod and Jen Ross, both of Edin­burgh Uni­ver­sity. The paper is enti­tled: “Struc­ture, author­ity and other con­cepts: teach­ing in fool-ish spaces” and was pre­sented to the ICE3 con­fer­ence which took place at Ross Pri­ory, Loch Lomond, in March 2007. Unfor­tu­nately, the link to the full paper is bro­ken and so I can only refer to the out­line of the paper on the con­fer­ence web­site — I believe the full paper would be well worth reading.

The coin­ci­den­tal aspect was in the men­tion by Hamish and Jen of Pullman’s notion of the dae­mon, the famil­iar that is an inte­gral part of what it to be human in Lyra’s world in the tril­ogy. The intrigu­ing aspect was in the play­ful, and yet entirely seri­ous, sug­ges­tion by Hamish and Jen, that the teacher’s role in an online space might pro­duc­tively reflect a rela­tion­ship to learn­ers based on some­thing akin to the rela­tion­ship between the dae­mon and his or her ‘owner’. Or, to take a dif­fer­ent tack (yet with evi­dent sim­i­lar­i­ties), the role might be mod­elled on the Loki from Norse mythol­ogy, or the fig­ures of Coy­ote and Raven from Native Amer­i­can cul­ture, or the court jester of Euro­pean renown.

In the sense sug­gested by the notion of the daemon:

“The teacher must be a pres­ence that the learner can cre­ate and con­trol to a cer­tain extent, and yet be a real and autonomous vir­tual other with whom the learner can inter­act, col­lab­o­rate and conflict.”

And if we look to the Jester model:

“The respon­si­bil­ity of these char­ac­ters is to poke fun at the estab­lished author­ity, and to ask ques­tions about what would seem to be the obvi­ous, nat­ural order of things. The fool is an irri­tant in the soci­ety around — like the prover­bial grain of sand in an oys­ter. S/he.…..is a maker of mis­chief and a cre­ator of ten­sion, occa­sion­ally with actively mali­cious intent, but more often than not s/he is also respon­si­ble for the res­o­lu­tion of the ten­sion by fun and foolery.”

Any­one involved in think­ing through the impli­ca­tions of the chang­ing con­text for edu­ca­tion inher­ent in the embrace of social media or Web 2.0 or online dis­tance learn­ing must be well aware of the dis­com­fort that teach­ers will inevitably feel at the shift­ing role brought about by those changes. Help­ing learn­ers to learn, or shap­ing the envi­ron­ment that makes learn­ing more effec­tive or more rel­e­vant, or prod­ding and dis­com­fit­ing learn­ers to pro­voke them into think­ing in fresh ways — all of these and oth­ers are valid roles for the teacher today. As Hamish and Jen note:

“These roles are not easy to sus­tain — they are uncom­fort­able and, per­haps, quite lonely. By embrac­ing dis­com­fort and lone­li­ness the teacher/fool can there­fore also per­haps gain insight into their stu­dents” sense of being lost in online spaces.“

Tech­no­rati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

§ 7 Responses to Teacher as Daemon and Jester"

  • diane says:

    Teacher as a nec­es­sary irri­tant; teacher as the moti­vat­ing spirit or soul of the learner: inter­est­ing new slant, awe­some responsibility.

    By the end of the tril­ogy, Lyra became a dae­mon for the entire world.

    Regard­less of what orga­nized reli­gion claims to see in these books, I find them to have a very strong moral tone with obvi­ous savior/sacrifice images.

    Thanks to heyjude for point­ing me to your blog!

    diane

  • John Connell says:

    Diane — good to make your acquain­tance via Judy’s blog.

    There are some uncom­fort­able ideas in the notions expressed by Hamish and Jen. Tak­ing your own words: ‘teacher as moti­vat­ing spirit’ should cause no one much of a prob­lem, but ‘teacher as soul of the learner’ I would want to think through very care­fully. There are too many, I fear, who would see that as a route to con­trol rather than guid­ance or encour­age­ment. Of course, (too) many teach­ers already see them­selves as a con­trol­ling force anyhow.

    Whichever notion one accepts, you are right that the choice itself, as well as the exe­cu­tion of the role taken on, is a mas­sive respon­si­bil­ity, and one that requires wis­dom and great care. I always believe it is ben­e­fi­cial to be put into an uncom­fort­able place when think­ing through such crit­i­cal deci­sions — the paper by Hamish and Jen does that.

    I obvi­ously need to sharpen up my sym­bolic skills, as the notion of Lyra as the world’s soul had not occurred to me — but you are right.

  • Hilery says:

    Fas­ci­nat­ing anal­ogy, John.
    I am more com­fort­able with the notion of teacher as Fool or Jester than as Dae­mon. The lat­ter is inex­tri­ca­bly inter­con­nected with the ‘other’ with whom s/he shares life itself. The Fool (Ariel, Puck) , on the other hand, can nee­dle, harass, pro­vide cog­ni­tive con­flict but is ulti­mately and glo­ri­ously sep­a­rate.
    If our aim as edu­ca­tors is to enable young peo­ple to be inde­pen­dent and autonomous, crit­i­cal and cre­ative, then at some point we need to encour­age them to take respon­si­bil­ity for their own learn­ing, their own lives.
    ’In fairy tales, it’s always the chil­dren who have the fine adven­tures. The adults have to stay at home and wait for the chil­dren to fly in the window’.

  • Jen Ros says:

    hi John — thanks for this post and the nod towards our paper! I am really inter­ested in what you say about dis­com­fort around the idea of the teacher as dae­mon or soul of the learner. I think that actu­ally I share that view. Our full paper talks a lot about the ten­sions between the power of the teacher’s role and the poten­tially chaotic and unruly nature of dig­i­tal spaces. How­ever, in our revised ver­sion (avail­able at http://jenr.edublogs.org/2008/09/25/paper-about-teaching-online-jesters-tricksters-and-fools/ ) we have removed the ref­er­ence to the dae­mon. It didn’t seem to quite fit any more, though we do still argue that the online teacher has to find ways to cre­ate a felt pres­ence for his or her stu­dents. I think your com­ment about how teach­ers may feel the need to try to con­trol stu­dents and online spaces illus­trates how dif­fi­cult a bal­anc­ing act this may be!

  • Jen Ross says:

    Oops! — man­aged to spell my name wrong in that last comment!

  • John Connell says:

    Must admit, Jen, I loved the dae­mon ref­er­ence, but I under­stand why you have removed it. I will read your update with great inter­est and, no doubt, will com­ment soon.

    John

  • […] inter­est­ing per­spec­tive on teach­ers’ role: Teacher as Dae­mon and Jester) Like this:LikeBe the first to like […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

What's this?

You are currently reading Teacher as Daemon and Jester at John Connell: The Blog.

meta