“To every man is given the key to the gates of heaven; the same key opens the gates of hell.”
In this context, the context of this rapidly flattening (but still very bumpy!) world, the gates of heaven lead to economic prosperity and security for the emerging nations, while the gates of hell lead to the misery of sustained poverty. The same key opens both gates: use the key wrongly and a nation will lose out in the global struggle for equity, social justice and well-being; use the key well and that same nation can begin to look to the future with justifiable optimism.
A number of transformational themes seem to be emerging out of the broad discourse around education’s role in development, and it is intriguing to hear the same issues and the same aspirations arise in countries in regions as diverse as Africa, the Middle East and South America. Themes coming up again and again include: collaborative learning, the criticality of direct engagement (with teachers, students, families, politicians), leadership and vision, partnership across the public and private sectors, equity, a re-empowerment of the teaching force, and the need to shift the locus of control to the individual learner (born out of a wider focus on the citizen). Alongside these high level themes, basic issues around economic and financial sustainability, sound project management and the importance of objective evaluation appear in various guises. It is these themes, and the growing, apparent, commonality of the issues they reflect, that leads me to conclude that the globalization of education is different in kind from any previous form of universality. Friedman’s flat world is, not surprisingly, flattening education too.
If all of this is true, then a massive burden is being placed on education, one that requires everyone with an interest in education, or for that matter in the wider political-economy of development, to be absolutely clear about how education systems across the globe can be modelled and shaped to deliver maximum advantage to billions of people living in, or on the edge of, poverty. The best people to do this are teachers, learners and education leaders themselves, but governments can do a lot to smooth (and to finance) the process.
And, at the same time, those from the older economies who want to see their education systems similarly transformed for the 21st century should be looking with a mixture of fascination and kinship at the burgeoning developments in the emerging nations. The global nation is education’s oyster!